>>> (chain (floor/ 5 2)
>>>          (- <2> <1>))
>
> It would be possible by replacing `<2>' with `(<> 2)'.
>
> But at least in this case, `(receive (x y) (floor/ 5 2) (- y x))' is
> much clearer (and no new syntax for Scheme programmers).

+1. We Schemers are already prone to obfuscating our code with "cadr"
and "cdar" instead of giving clear names to the intermediate things :)