|
Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 12:03 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Aug 2020 14:09 UTC)
|
||
|
Signal handling
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:22 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Aug 2020 14:32 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 15:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Aug 2020 15:28 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 17:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Aug 2020 18:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 18:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Aug 2020 21:18 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Aug 2020 21:23 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(07 Aug 2020 02:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Aug 2020 15:32 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 16:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Signal handling
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Aug 2020 14:33 UTC)
|
||
|
Signal handling with terminals
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:44 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 14:48 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 15:20 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 16:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 16:34 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 16:57 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(07 Aug 2020 21:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(08 Aug 2020 18:36 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(09 Aug 2020 00:31 UTC)
|
||
Am Do., 6. Aug. 2020 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>: >> For threads, we have a nice API in SRFI 18. > > > I have a (slightly enhanced) version of the thread part of the API as a pre-SRFI at <https://github.com/johnwcowan/r7rs-work/blob/master/FuturesCowan.md>, including monad procedures. > > I believe that mutexes and conditions are too low-level, and would prefer channels and goroutines. I plan to use <http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/gochan> as a base document for a future SRFI. Have you talked in detail to Marc Feeley about these ideas?
