Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 12:03 UTC)
|
||
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Aug 2020 14:09 UTC)
|
||
Signal handling
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:22 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Aug 2020 14:32 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 15:13 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Aug 2020 15:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 17:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Aug 2020 18:19 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling Lassi Kortela (06 Aug 2020 18:35 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Aug 2020 21:18 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Aug 2020 21:23 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(07 Aug 2020 02:56 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Aug 2020 15:32 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 16:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: Signal handling
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Aug 2020 14:33 UTC)
|
||
Signal handling with terminals
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:54 UTC)
|
||
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 14:44 UTC)
|
||
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 14:48 UTC)
|
||
Re: Scope of SRFI 205 and a slightly more complex POSIX/ANSI terminal API
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 15:20 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 16:08 UTC)
|
||
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(06 Aug 2020 16:34 UTC)
|
||
Re: UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(06 Aug 2020 16:57 UTC)
|
||
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(07 Aug 2020 21:30 UTC)
|
||
Re: UI event datatypes
Lassi Kortela
(08 Aug 2020 18:36 UTC)
|
||
Re: UI event datatypes
John Cowan
(09 Aug 2020 00:31 UTC)
|
> The only concern with that is the BSD license > on the code; is that going to be a problem? > > I don't see a license notice, but we could ask him to > allow us to use it under the MIT license. Indeed, if you know the author of some code/prose personally, please ask them if they can dual-license any stuff where licensing is difficult to figure out. MIT and BSD should be equivalent in practice so it's hard to imagine that any Schemer would be strongly in favor of one but not the other, especially given the opportunity to help Scheme and SRFI. Copyleft vs permissive is a real debate, but both of these licenses are permissive. > He makes a good case for the SML model. I'm not familiar with Concurrent ML, but everyone in the Scheme community who knows it seems to love it. Loko implements it as well.