If a split is done, the write and read procedures probably should go
into the lexical syntax SRFI.

Am Mi., 7. Okt. 2020 um 17:08 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:49 AM Daphne Preston-Kendal <xxxxxx@nonceword.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Arthur, could we perhaps split them back out again into two separate
>> SRFIs without starting the process over? (Lawyering the process
>> document a bit, it says that the 60 day limit applies for *proposals*,
>> not SRFIs per se. Since the entire contents of the new SRFI have
>> already been discussed here, it would seem appropriate to consider the
>> new split-out SRFI — whether the split takes out the procedures or the
>> reader notation — to be the same proposal as already considered in this
>> one.)
>
>
> That's perfectly fine.  As you can see from the SRFI list, I have not been enforcing the time limits.  (I encourage authors to follow them as closely as possible, though.)  Just submit a new draft of this SRFI with parts removed, and submit a new SRFI with those parts in it.  Both with the requisite examples, sample implementation and tests, of course.