Re: semantics and portability

Show/hide message thread

semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 17:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (09 Mar 2001 18:04 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Per Bothner (09 Mar 2001 19:09 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:44 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 19:57 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 12:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 12:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 14:49 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley 20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC

> >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>
> Marc> By the way, I feel SRFI 22 is the right place to introduce a "getenv"
> Marc> procedure, because SRFI 22 clearly is about the interaction between a
> Marc> Scheme program and its invocation from the shell, and also it has
> Marc> a definite UNIX bias.
>
> I can see your point.  Should we then also include "exit"?

Go for it.

Marc