> Am So., 16. März 2025 um 14:19 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
> <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I just noticed that I missed sending the following post to the mailing list.
>>
>> @Daphne: Does it answer your questions about how to use SRFI 254 and why the proposed `ephemeron-case` would be useless?
>>
>> Marc

I don’t understand how this code demonstrates that ephemeron-case isn’t needed – it could be reformulated in terms of it – but I also don’t think that finalization should be held up by my lack of understanding :-)

If ephemeron-case is useful, we can continue arguing about it post-finalization and add it to R7-large without a SRFI. It is syntactic sugar, after all.

Daphne