PS And maybe give a simple example of how a user would typically use it.

Am So., 3. Aug. 2025 um 17:29 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> Maybe I don't understand the semantics of your ephemeron-case form.
> Reading your first post, there does not seem to be a reference barrier
> on the key in the broken path. Can you give a syntax-case definition
> of ephemeron case?
>
> Am So., 3. Aug. 2025 um 11:38 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
> <xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:
> >
> > > Am So., 16. März 2025 um 14:19 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
> > > <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> I just noticed that I missed sending the following post to the mailing list.
> > >>
> > >> @Daphne: Does it answer your questions about how to use SRFI 254 and why the proposed `ephemeron-case` would be useless?
> > >>
> > >> Marc
> >
> >
> > I don’t understand how this code demonstrates that ephemeron-case isn’t needed – it could be reformulated in terms of it – but I also don’t think that finalization should be held up by my lack of understanding :-)
> >
> > If ephemeron-case is useful, we can continue arguing about it post-finalization and add it to R7-large without a SRFI. It is syntactic sugar, after all.
> >
> >
> > Daphne
> >
> >