Request for review Daniel Ziltener (09 Mar 2026 01:24 UTC)
Re: Request for review Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Mar 2026 01:32 UTC)
Re: Request for review Peter McGoron (09 Mar 2026 01:45 UTC)
Re: Request for review jobol (09 Mar 2026 18:52 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (09 Mar 2026 22:36 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (11 Mar 2026 22:59 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (09 Mar 2026 22:39 UTC)
Re: Request for review Peter McGoron (09 Mar 2026 23:22 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (11 Mar 2026 23:12 UTC)
Re: Request for review Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Mar 2026 23:23 UTC)
Re: Request for review jobol (11 Mar 2026 21:38 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (11 Mar 2026 22:48 UTC)
Re: Request for review jobol (13 Mar 2026 07:50 UTC)
Re: Request for review John Cowan (13 Mar 2026 14:16 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (13 Mar 2026 15:00 UTC)
Re: Request for review jobol (13 Mar 2026 15:39 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (13 Mar 2026 22:43 UTC)
Re: Request for review John Cowan (14 Mar 2026 07:47 UTC)
Re: Request for review jobol (14 Mar 2026 07:54 UTC)
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (15 Mar 2026 23:30 UTC)

Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener 11 Mar 2026 22:59 UTC

On 3/9/26 19:51, jobol wrote:
> Adding a syntax 'new-object' (or 'create-object' but it is more
> Scheme than Object) similar to 'define-object' but returning the created
> object could be good. Then 'define-object' can be defined using it.
>
> Reading the implementation, the object returned by mirror can't be
> mirrored. Either allows mirror objects to be mirrored or tell that it
> can't. I'm voting to mirroring mirrors. It is probably not useful but
> it avoid mirror to be exception.
>
Both done, will be part of the next draft. :) Mirrors are cloneable and
mirrorable now, and their inheritance tree mirrors the one of the object
they belong to, so it is possible to extend mirror functionality for a
subset of the class tree.

Best regards,
Daniel Ziltener