|
Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Mar 2026 01:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 01:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(09 Mar 2026 18:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener (11 Mar 2026 22:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 23:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 23:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Mar 2026 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(11 Mar 2026 21:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 22:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(13 Mar 2026 07:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(13 Mar 2026 14:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 15:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(13 Mar 2026 15:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 22:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(14 Mar 2026 07:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(14 Mar 2026 07:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(15 Mar 2026 23:30 UTC)
|
On 3/9/26 19:51, jobol wrote: > Adding a syntax 'new-object' (or 'create-object' but it is more > Scheme than Object) similar to 'define-object' but returning the created > object could be good. Then 'define-object' can be defined using it. > > Reading the implementation, the object returned by mirror can't be > mirrored. Either allows mirror objects to be mirrored or tell that it > can't. I'm voting to mirroring mirrors. It is probably not useful but > it avoid mirror to be exception. > Both done, will be part of the next draft. :) Mirrors are cloneable and mirrorable now, and their inheritance tree mirrors the one of the object they belong to, so it is possible to extend mirror functionality for a subset of the class tree. Best regards, Daniel Ziltener