|
Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Mar 2026 01:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 01:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(09 Mar 2026 18:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 22:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 23:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 23:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Mar 2026 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(11 Mar 2026 21:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 22:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(13 Mar 2026 07:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(13 Mar 2026 14:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 15:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review jobol (13 Mar 2026 15:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 22:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(14 Mar 2026 07:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(14 Mar 2026 07:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(15 Mar 2026 23:30 UTC)
|
Le Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:15:46 -0400, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026, 3:50 AM jobol <xxxxxx@nonadev.net> wrote: > > And you can find some other. Confusing isn't it? > > > > In my opinion the method should be called 'fresh-child' or > > 'procreate'. > > I prefer either clone or copy (which I agree are synonyms). Hi John, I'm suspecting that you fell in the confusing trap. The proposed clone method is not a copy at all. The returned object does not hold any value except its parent. But maybe not and I am the only one confused. > > > > > I also think that there is a need for a cloning (copying) method > > that will return a copy of immediate slots in a fresh instance. > > Possible names are clone, copy, twin, fresh-copy, fresh-twin, ... > > > > I think shallow-copy is a good name for this.