|
Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Mar 2026 01:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 01:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(09 Mar 2026 18:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 22:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(09 Mar 2026 22:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Peter McGoron
(09 Mar 2026 23:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 23:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Mar 2026 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(11 Mar 2026 21:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(11 Mar 2026 22:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(13 Mar 2026 07:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(13 Mar 2026 14:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 15:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
jobol
(13 Mar 2026 15:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(13 Mar 2026 22:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
John Cowan
(14 Mar 2026 07:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review jobol (14 Mar 2026 07:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Request for review
Daniel Ziltener
(15 Mar 2026 23:30 UTC)
|
Le Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:43:17 +0100, Daniel Ziltener <xxxxxx@lyrion.ch> a écrit : > Other names we came up with after a short brainstorming on #chicken > that I'd like to suggest: > > - induce > - derive > - metastasize > > I think `derive` would be my favourite. Sounds technical enough to be > taken seriously, and is quite precise in its meaning. > I like 'derive'. +1
