Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 19:13 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(29 Oct 2003 20:06 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 20:47 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 23:24 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2003 01:53 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 04:42 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:11 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:33 UTC)
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:19 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 18:13 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:18 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:49 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 22:28 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Alex Shinn
(31 Oct 2003 03:04 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(31 Oct 2003 03:20 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Alex Shinn
(31 Oct 2003 07:13 UTC)
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 23:07 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(31 Oct 2003 03:12 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:57 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:06 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 19:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:08 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:48 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:02 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
> If that's too difficult, then it's better to eliminate the isomorphism, > which effectively means no dispatching on primitive types. And without > them, SRFI-44 has no concrete collections at all. With no concrete > collections and no defined method for dispatch, all that's left is > vapor. You're so dramatic Bradd. You can very well have concrete types in SRFI-44, its just that trying to wedge the non-collection types from Scheme in that causes problems.