Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 19:13 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(29 Oct 2003 20:06 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 20:47 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 23:24 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2003 01:53 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 04:42 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:11 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:33 UTC)
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:19 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 18:13 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:18 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:49 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 22:28 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Alex Shinn
(31 Oct 2003 03:04 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(31 Oct 2003 03:20 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Alex Shinn
(31 Oct 2003 07:13 UTC)
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 23:07 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(31 Oct 2003 03:12 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws scgmille@xxxxxx (30 Oct 2003 21:57 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:06 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 19:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:08 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:48 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:02 UTC)
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:49:46PM -0600, xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:35:07PM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote: > > > > No, it's a flaw in the design. You distinguish lists from alists > > according to content. You'll have isomorphism problems whenever the > > content of a list happens to match the structure of an alist. The only > > way to avoid that is to eliminate support for primitive alists -- which > > means eliminating support for one of the most common Scheme collections. Also, you'll notice that we no longer claim compatibility between Scheme alists and the SRFI-44 alist-dicts (one of Shiro's issues that was addressed). Scott