|
Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 17:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 19:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(29 Oct 2003 20:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2003 20:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(29 Oct 2003 23:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2003 01:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 04:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 16:33 UTC)
|
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 16:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 18:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 22:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 22:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws Alex Shinn (31 Oct 2003 03:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(31 Oct 2003 03:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Alex Shinn
(31 Oct 2003 07:13 UTC)
|
|
RE: Fundamental design flaws
Anton van Straaten
(30 Oct 2003 23:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(31 Oct 2003 03:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 17:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 18:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 18:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 19:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 19:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
bear
(30 Oct 2003 20:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 20:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Tom Lord
(30 Oct 2003 20:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
scgmille@xxxxxx
(30 Oct 2003 21:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Fundamental design flaws
Bradd W. Szonye
(30 Oct 2003 21:26 UTC)
|
At Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:52:06 -0600, xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote: > > 44 never just takes an existing vector or list and says "Hey, you're an > SRFI-44 sequence". Valid 44 collections must be created using the > make-list and make-vector or list and vector constructors. Any behavior > with primitive Scheme types is undefined. So SRFI-44 make-vector is incompatible with the R5RS make-vector, and SRFI-44 make-list is incompatible with SRFI-1 make-list? -- Alex
