no constants please Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:06 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 18:55 UTC)

Re: no constants please Michael Sperber 26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <xxxxxx@emf.net> writes:

Tom> SCHEME_FALSE, SCHEME_TRUE, SCHEME_NULL, and SCHEME_UNSPECIFIC should
Tom> be functions, not constants:

Why?

Tom> [...] because, you never know, those constants might be heap allocated.

That, AFAICS, doesn't mandate the above.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla