Date Index - December 2003 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

22 Dec 2003 07:37 UTC	thread-safe interfaces	Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 14:16 UTC	character strings versus byte strings	Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Per Bothner
22 Dec 2003 17:23 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Matthew Flatt
22 Dec 2003 17:54 UTC	Couple things...	felix
22 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC	GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 21:51 UTC	Strings/chars	Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 22:10 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:21 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:24 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Jim Blandy
22 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:30 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:37 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 22:41 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
22 Dec 2003 22:59 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Tom Lord
22 Dec 2003 23:00 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Shiro Kawai
22 Dec 2003 23:45 UTC	passing C data to Scheme world	Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 01:09 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	bear
23 Dec 2003 01:29 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	bear
23 Dec 2003 01:47 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	bear
23 Dec 2003 03:29 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 03:30 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 04:45 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	bear
23 Dec 2003 09:22 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:30 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC	Re: thread-safe interfaces	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:36 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 09:48 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 09:57 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 10:12 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 10:56 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Michael Sperber
23 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	bear
23 Dec 2003 17:46 UTC	Re: character strings versus byte strings	Bradd W. Szonye
23 Dec 2003 18:34 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Jim Blandy
23 Dec 2003 21:33 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 23:04 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 23:24 UTC	Re: handling multiple scheme instances	Shiro Kawai
23 Dec 2003 23:27 UTC	more on GC issues	Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC	handling multiple scheme instances	Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC	Re: handling multiple scheme instances	tb@xxxxxx
23 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC	no constants please	Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:31 UTC	non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
23 Dec 2003 23:33 UTC	maybe pika	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 00:03 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	bear
24 Dec 2003 01:34 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Per Bothner
24 Dec 2003 02:48 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Alex Shinn
24 Dec 2003 05:11 UTC	Re: Strings/chars	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 08:37 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 11:46 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
24 Dec 2003 12:03 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
24 Dec 2003 12:42 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
24 Dec 2003 16:25 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 16:43 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 17:34 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 18:06 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 18:08 UTC	Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?	bear
24 Dec 2003 18:10 UTC	target applications	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC	Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 20:21 UTC	Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?	bear
24 Dec 2003 20:29 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 20:34 UTC	Re: target applications	tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 21:05 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
24 Dec 2003 22:23 UTC	Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction]	Jim Blandy
24 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
24 Dec 2003 23:51 UTC	Re: target applications	Jim Blandy
25 Dec 2003 00:59 UTC	Re: target applications	Tom Lord
25 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC	general	cr88192
26 Dec 2003 15:15 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:18 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:24 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:41 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:42 UTC	Re: maybe pika	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 15:47 UTC	Re: target applications	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:14 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:20 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 18:30 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
26 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:17 UTC	flow of control issues	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC	Re: maybe pika	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:29 UTC	numeric ranges and errors	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:43 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 19:48 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
26 Dec 2003 20:16 UTC	Re: maybe pika	Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 16:08 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:10 UTC	Re: GC safety and return values	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:12 UTC	Re: handling multiple scheme instances	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:16 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 16:21 UTC	Re: flow of control issues	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 17:33 UTC	Re: passing C data to Scheme world	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:43 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 18:46 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
27 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:13 UTC	Re: handling multiple scheme instances	Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:19 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:33 UTC	Re: flow of control issues	Tom Lord
27 Dec 2003 19:34 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
27 Dec 2003 20:19 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
27 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
27 Dec 2003 20:35 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
27 Dec 2003 21:18 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
28 Dec 2003 02:36 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 06:54 UTC	Re: Couple things...	tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 09:25 UTC	Re: Couple things...	Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:32 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC	Re: no constants please	Michael Sperber
28 Dec 2003 09:45 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
28 Dec 2003 17:25 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
28 Dec 2003 18:00 UTC	Re: non-local exits are icky	Tom Lord
29 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC	misc	cr88192
30 Dec 2003 21:44 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
30 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC	Re: Couple things...	felix
31 Dec 2003 08:22 UTC	Re: no constants please	Ken Dickey
31 Dec 2003 14:51 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC	Re: no constants please	bear
31 Dec 2003 18:24 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:07 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 19:11 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 19:49 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx
31 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 20:01 UTC	Re: no constants please	bear
31 Dec 2003 21:12 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 21:58 UTC	Re: no constants please	Richard Kelsey
31 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 22:42 UTC	Re: no constants please	Tom Lord
31 Dec 2003 23:39 UTC	Re: no constants please	tb@xxxxxx