Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

Thread Index - December 2003 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

thread-safe interfaces Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 07:37 UTC)
Re: thread-safe interfaces Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC)
Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction] Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 22:23 UTC)
character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt (22 Dec 2003 14:16 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Per Bothner (22 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Matthew Flatt (22 Dec 2003 17:23 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:30 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:21 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:59 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:41 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 23:00 UTC)
passing C data to Scheme world Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 23:45 UTC)
Re: passing C data to Scheme world Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 17:33 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:29 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 03:30 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 04:45 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 09:48 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 17:42 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Bradd W. Szonye (23 Dec 2003 17:46 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:09 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings bear (23 Dec 2003 01:47 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 03:29 UTC)
Re: character strings versus byte strings Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:36 UTC)
Couple things... felix (22 Dec 2003 17:54 UTC)
Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (22 Dec 2003 21:51 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:37 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:30 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Alex Shinn (24 Dec 2003 02:48 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 05:11 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 10:56 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (23 Dec 2003 21:33 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars bear (24 Dec 2003 00:03 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 09:22 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 09:57 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (23 Dec 2003 10:12 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Per Bothner (24 Dec 2003 01:34 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 11:46 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 18:46 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (27 Dec 2003 19:34 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (27 Dec 2003 20:35 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 21:18 UTC)
Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (28 Dec 2003 06:54 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (30 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 12:42 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:15 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 20:19 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:25 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (30 Dec 2003 21:44 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (23 Dec 2003 18:34 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (24 Dec 2003 12:03 UTC)
Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 16:25 UTC)
Re: Couple things... felix (27 Dec 2003 20:23 UTC)
GC safety and return values Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 21:22 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (22 Dec 2003 22:10 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx (22 Dec 2003 22:27 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:18 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:20 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:08 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (22 Dec 2003 22:24 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:04 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 08:37 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 17:34 UTC)
Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear (24 Dec 2003 18:08 UTC)
Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC)
Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful? bear (24 Dec 2003 20:21 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 20:29 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 21:05 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:24 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:14 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:10 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 16:43 UTC)
Re: GC safety and return values Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 18:06 UTC)
more on GC issues Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:27 UTC)
handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Shiro Kawai (23 Dec 2003 23:24 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 23:29 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:12 UTC)
Re: handling multiple scheme instances Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 19:13 UTC)
no constants please Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:30 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (23 Dec 2003 23:10 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 18:31 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:48 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 19:19 UTC)
Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:34 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (28 Dec 2003 09:45 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 17:25 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 14:51 UTC)
Re: no constants please bear (31 Dec 2003 17:09 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 18:24 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 19:07 UTC)
Re: no constants please bear (31 Dec 2003 20:01 UTC)
Re: no constants please Ken Dickey (31 Dec 2003 08:22 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 19:11 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 19:58 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (31 Dec 2003 19:49 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 21:12 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 21:59 UTC)
Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (31 Dec 2003 21:58 UTC)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 22:42 UTC)
Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (31 Dec 2003 23:39 UTC)
non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:31 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:41 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 18:38 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 18:30 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:43 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:16 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 18:43 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 02:36 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (28 Dec 2003 09:32 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (28 Dec 2003 18:00 UTC)
maybe pika Tom Lord (23 Dec 2003 23:33 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:42 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:24 UTC)
Re: maybe pika Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 20:16 UTC)
target applications Tom Lord (24 Dec 2003 18:10 UTC)
Re: target applications tb@xxxxxx (24 Dec 2003 20:34 UTC)
Re: target applications Michael Sperber (26 Dec 2003 15:47 UTC)
Re: target applications Jim Blandy (24 Dec 2003 23:51 UTC)
Re: target applications Tom Lord (25 Dec 2003 00:59 UTC)
general cr88192 (25 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC)
flow of control issues Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:17 UTC)
Re: flow of control issues Michael Sperber (27 Dec 2003 16:21 UTC)
Re: flow of control issues Tom Lord (27 Dec 2003 19:33 UTC)
numeric ranges and errors Tom Lord (26 Dec 2003 19:29 UTC)
misc cr88192 (29 Dec 2003 10:19 UTC)
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: no constants please Tom Lord (31 Dec 2003 19:03 UTC)