Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 00:05 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 01:43 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
felix
(24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(24 Jun 2004 12:07 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 17:33 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Felix Winkelmann
(25 Jun 2004 04:58 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising Alan Watson (25 Jun 2004 16:12 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(25 Jun 2004 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(25 Jun 2004 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Bradd W. Szonye
(25 Jun 2004 18:51 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising Alan Watson 25 Jun 2004 16:11 UTC
Hi Felix, > If we restrict ourselves to SRFIs that can be implemented on any R5RS > system without changes, we would get nowhere. I'm not suggesting that we should restrict ourselves to SRFIs that can be implemented using only R5RS features. Neither am I suggesting that we limit ourselves to SRFIs that can be implemented on all "common" Schemes (although it may be a good idea). Sorry if I've not been clear. However, I think it would be reasonable to explicitly state in the SRFI document whether a SRFI (a) can be implemented using only R5RS features; (b) can be implemented in all common Schemes using non-R5RS features; or (c) cannot be implemented in all common Schemes. Obviously, "all common Schemes" is open to interpretation, but it should certainly include Scheme48, and so, in the spirit of full disclosure, SRFI-55 should include a statement along the lines of (c). Regards, Alan -- Dr Alan Watson Centro de Radioastronom��a y Astrof��sica UNAM