|
Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 00:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 01:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
felix
(24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(24 Jun 2004 12:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 17:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Felix Winkelmann
(25 Jun 2004 04:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(25 Jun 2004 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(25 Jun 2004 16:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(25 Jun 2004 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising Bradd W. Szonye (25 Jun 2004 18:51 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising Bradd W. Szonye 25 Jun 2004 18:51 UTC
Felix Winkelmann wrote: > If we restrict ourselves to SRFIs that can be implemented on > any R5RS system without changes, we would get nowhere. This SRFI goes beyond that; allegedly, it's fundamentally incompatible with the design of at least one Scheme system. There's a difference between "needs extra work to support it" and "fundamentally incompatible." -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd