|
Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 00:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
campbell@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2004 01:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
felix
(24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(24 Jun 2004 12:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(24 Jun 2004 17:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Felix Winkelmann
(25 Jun 2004 04:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Alan Watson
(25 Jun 2004 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Robby Findler
(25 Jun 2004 16:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising Alan Watson (25 Jun 2004 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Truth in advertising
Bradd W. Szonye
(25 Jun 2004 18:51 UTC)
|
Re: Truth in advertising Alan Watson 25 Jun 2004 16:59 UTC
Hi Robby, > It sounds like you are suggesting additional process for the SRFI > mechanism itself. I'm happy to treat this as a "quality of SRFI" issue. That is, I think that well-written SRFIs should include this information. The balance of evidence suggests to me that most if not all SRFI authors welcome comments that help them improve the quality of their SRFIs. Regards, Alan -- Dr Alan Watson Centro de Radioastronom��a y Astrof��sica UNAM