Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes:

> I wasn't actually suggesting Schemes supporting SRFI-68 voluntarily
> restrict themselves in this manner, I meant rather to show what the
> problem is along with a more concrete solution implemented using
> SRFI-68, like using a hash-table to implement a vector.

Understood.  I meant to say that I didn't understand your solution.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla