| 01 Jan 2005 00:58 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 01 Jan 2005 01:17 UTC |
Re: precision of signed integers |
Joseph Osako |
| 01 Jan 2005 04:17 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 01 Jan 2005 06:33 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 01 Jan 2005 07:26 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 01 Jan 2005 09:20 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Per Bothner |
| 01 Jan 2005 09:52 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Per Bothner |
| 01 Jan 2005 10:05 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 01 Jan 2005 17:22 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 01 Jan 2005 18:44 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 01 Jan 2005 21:25 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 02 Jan 2005 04:34 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 02 Jan 2005 05:04 UTC |
strings and char arrays (Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10) |
Shiro Kawai |
| 02 Jan 2005 05:14 UTC |
self evaluation, immutability |
Shiro Kawai |
| 02 Jan 2005 05:46 UTC |
Re: self evaluation, immutability |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 02 Jan 2005 09:10 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Thomas Lord |
| 02 Jan 2005 17:14 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
David Van Horn |
| 02 Jan 2005 17:39 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 02 Jan 2005 17:49 UTC |
Re: strings and char arrays (Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10) |
bear |
| 02 Jan 2005 17:57 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 02 Jan 2005 18:47 UTC |
Re: strings and char arrays (Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10) |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 02 Jan 2005 19:20 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 02 Jan 2005 19:26 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 02 Jan 2005 19:34 UTC |
Re: Revised draft available |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 02 Jan 2005 19:58 UTC |
unbounded chars considered dangerous (Re: strings and char arrays) |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 02 Jan 2005 20:09 UTC |
Re: Revised draft available |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 02 Jan 2005 20:58 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Matthias Radestock |
| 02 Jan 2005 21:04 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
campbell@xxxxxx |
| 02 Jan 2005 21:27 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 02 Jan 2005 21:27 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Per Bothner |
| 02 Jan 2005 22:38 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Thomas Lord |
| 02 Jan 2005 23:00 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Per Bothner |
| 03 Jan 2005 04:16 UTC |
SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 03 Jan 2005 06:00 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
bear |
| 03 Jan 2005 06:36 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Per Bothner |
| 03 Jan 2005 15:27 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Tony Garnock-Jones |
| 03 Jan 2005 17:00 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 03 Jan 2005 18:46 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 03 Jan 2005 19:08 UTC |
Revised draft available |
David Van Horn |
| 03 Jan 2005 19:16 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 03 Jan 2005 21:11 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 03 Jan 2005 22:54 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Taylor Campbell |
| 03 Jan 2005 23:22 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Taylor Campbell |
| 04 Jan 2005 00:33 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 04 Jan 2005 20:40 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Per Bothner |
| 04 Jan 2005 21:42 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 04 Jan 2005 22:28 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 04 Jan 2005 23:03 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Per Bothner |
| 05 Jan 2005 00:07 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 01:24 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 01:25 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Matthias Radestock |
| 05 Jan 2005 01:59 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 02:13 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Per Bothner |
| 05 Jan 2005 02:21 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 05 Jan 2005 02:39 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Shiro Kawai |
| 05 Jan 2005 02:41 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 02:48 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 03:07 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 03:24 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 05 Jan 2005 03:34 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Taylor Campbell |
| 05 Jan 2005 03:39 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Per Bothner |
| 05 Jan 2005 03:54 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 04:06 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 05 Jan 2005 04:15 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 04:38 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 05:54 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 05 Jan 2005 06:24 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
bear |
| 05 Jan 2005 07:55 UTC |
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 11:48 UTC |
Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 12:22 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 12:44 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 12:53 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 12:58 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 16:55 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 05 Jan 2005 17:03 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 05 Jan 2005 17:04 UTC |
New revision available |
David Van Horn |
| 05 Jan 2005 17:40 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
David Van Horn |
| 05 Jan 2005 17:41 UTC |
Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10 |
David Van Horn |
| 06 Jan 2005 00:13 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Shiro Kawai |
| 06 Jan 2005 00:48 UTC |
dope vector |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 06 Jan 2005 00:49 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 06 Jan 2005 00:52 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 06 Jan 2005 06:08 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 06 Jan 2005 10:48 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 07 Jan 2005 04:17 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 07 Jan 2005 09:07 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
bear |
| 07 Jan 2005 12:51 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 07 Jan 2005 13:24 UTC |
Scheme flonum literals |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 07 Jan 2005 16:58 UTC |
Re: Scheme flonum literals |
bear |
| 10 Jan 2005 02:40 UTC |
Re: Scheme flonum literals |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 17 Jan 2005 05:13 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 17 Jan 2005 12:36 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 18 Jan 2005 17:41 UTC |
Draft period correction for SRFI 58 |
David Van Horn |
| 20 Jan 2005 00:05 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 21 Jan 2005 05:13 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 22 Jan 2005 00:49 UTC |
Re: Floating-point formats and standards |
Bradd W. Szonye |
| 24 Jan 2005 15:12 UTC |
New revision available |
David Van Horn |
| 27 Jan 2005 14:38 UTC |
SRFI 58 Draft extension, new revision available |
David Van Horn |
