|
Re: infinities reformulated
Chongkai Zhu
(31 May 2005 07:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated Aubrey Jaffer (31 May 2005 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 16:16 UTC)
|
|
string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 19:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 20:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(03 Jun 2005 01:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(03 Jun 2005 02:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(15 Jun 2005 21:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(16 Jun 2005 15:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
bear
(16 Jun 2005 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(17 Jun 2005 02:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(04 Jun 2005 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(17 Jun 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(19 Jun 2005 17:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(20 Jun 2005 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(20 Jun 2005 05:46 UTC)
|
|
precise-numbers
Aubrey Jaffer
(26 Jun 2005 01:50 UTC)
|
| Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:16:37 +0800 | From: "Chongkai Zhu" <xxxxxx@citiz.net> | | I mentioned Mathematica, only for the "inexact number" part of it, | not the "symbolic manipluation" part of it. For example, if you | want to save the square root of 2 as an inexact number, you can | write: | | v1=1.414 | | the precision or the inexact number v1 is 4 (decimal digits); | | but you can also write | | v2=1.414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875376948073176679737990732478462107038850387534327641573 | | and v2 will get precision 100 (all these digits are saved into memory). So in a Scheme implementation which has "arbitrarily big" precision, how many digits is (sqrt 2)? How many digits is (sin 7/5)?
