|
Re: infinities reformulated
Chongkai Zhu
(31 May 2005 07:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(31 May 2005 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated Thomas Bushnell BSG (02 Jun 2005 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 16:16 UTC)
|
|
string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 19:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 20:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(03 Jun 2005 01:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(03 Jun 2005 02:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(15 Jun 2005 21:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(16 Jun 2005 15:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
bear
(16 Jun 2005 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(17 Jun 2005 02:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(04 Jun 2005 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(17 Jun 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(19 Jun 2005 17:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(20 Jun 2005 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(20 Jun 2005 05:46 UTC)
|
|
precise-numbers
Aubrey Jaffer
(26 Jun 2005 01:50 UTC)
|
Aubrey Jaffer <xxxxxx@alum.mit.edu> writes: > So in a Scheme implementation which has "arbitrarily big" precision, > how many digits is (sqrt 2)? How many digits is (sin 7/5)? There is no function "precision-of", so there is no need for an answer. Arbitrarily big precision arithmetic (generally) works pretty well; you carry around symbolic representations and operate on them.
