| 16 May 2005 20:44 UTC |
what about dropping rest-lists? |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 16 May 2005 22:01 UTC |
Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT |
Alpha Petrofsky |
| 16 May 2005 22:19 UTC |
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 17 May 2005 06:35 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
felix winkelmann |
| 17 May 2005 08:42 UTC |
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT |
Sebastian Egner |
| 17 May 2005 08:51 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Sebastian Egner |
| 17 May 2005 11:58 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Sebastian Egner |
| 17 May 2005 12:26 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 17 May 2005 19:41 UTC |
I like the idea |
Ulrich Hobelmann |
| 18 May 2005 05:19 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
felix winkelmann |
| 18 May 2005 08:35 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Sebastian Egner |
| 18 May 2005 09:15 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Sebastian Egner |
| 18 May 2005 14:00 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 18 May 2005 14:20 UTC |
Revision of SRFI 71 available |
Michael Sperber |
| 18 May 2005 19:45 UTC |
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 18 May 2005 20:30 UTC |
Rest and patterns |
David Van Horn |
| 18 May 2005 20:37 UTC |
Difference between values->list and list |
Christian Couder |
| 18 May 2005 22:00 UTC |
Re: Rest and patterns |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 19 May 2005 02:01 UTC |
How about dropping semi-variable-arity? |
Petrofsky, The Reverend Al |
| 19 May 2005 07:44 UTC |
Re: Difference between values->list and list |
Sebastian Egner |
| 19 May 2005 08:04 UTC |
Re: Rest and patterns |
Sebastian Egner |
| 19 May 2005 12:12 UTC |
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? |
Sebastian Egner |
| 19 May 2005 14:36 UTC |
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 19 May 2005 16:24 UTC |
Re: Rest and patterns |
David Van Horn |
| 19 May 2005 18:22 UTC |
Re: Rest and patterns |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 20 May 2005 18:10 UTC |
multiple-value set! |
Neil W. Van Dyke |
| 23 May 2005 13:29 UTC |
Re: multiple-value set! |
Sebastian Egner |
