Thread Index - May 2005 - srfi-71@srfi.schemers.org

To perform a single character wildcard search use the "?" symbol. To perform a multiple character wildcard search use the "*" symbol.

what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke 16 May 2005 20:44 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? felix winkelmann 17 May 2005 06:35 UTC
Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Alpha Petrofsky 16 May 2005 22:01 UTC
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Neil W. Van Dyke 16 May 2005 22:19 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Sebastian Egner 17 May 2005 08:42 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner 17 May 2005 08:51 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke 17 May 2005 12:26 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner 17 May 2005 11:58 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? felix winkelmann 18 May 2005 05:19 UTC
I like the idea Ulrich Hobelmann 17 May 2005 19:41 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner 18 May 2005 08:35 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner 18 May 2005 09:15 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke 18 May 2005 14:00 UTC
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke 18 May 2005 19:45 UTC
Revision of SRFI 71 available Michael Sperber 18 May 2005 14:20 UTC
Difference between values->list and list Christian Couder 18 May 2005 20:37 UTC
Rest and patterns David Van Horn 18 May 2005 20:30 UTC
Re: Rest and patterns Neil W. Van Dyke 18 May 2005 22:00 UTC
How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Petrofsky, The Reverend Al 19 May 2005 02:01 UTC
Re: Rest and patterns David Van Horn 19 May 2005 16:24 UTC
Re: Rest and patterns Neil W. Van Dyke 19 May 2005 18:22 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Difference between values->list and list Sebastian Egner 19 May 2005 07:44 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Rest and patterns Sebastian Egner 19 May 2005 08:04 UTC
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Sebastian Egner 19 May 2005 12:12 UTC
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Neil W. Van Dyke 19 May 2005 14:36 UTC
multiple-value set! Neil W. Van Dyke 20 May 2005 18:10 UTC
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: multiple-value set! Sebastian Egner 23 May 2005 13:29 UTC