NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 15:50 UTC)
|
Re: NaN's
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: NaN's
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 19:14 UTC)
|
Re: NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 22:49 UTC)
|
Error objects in general
bear
(29 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 20:22 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 05:57 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(30 Oct 2005 14:17 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(29 Oct 2005 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 05:40 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general Taylor Campbell (30 Oct 2005 05:45 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 06:08 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2005 16:49 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 05:54 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 06:07 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 06:46 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Paul Schlie
(30 Oct 2005 12:39 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Paul Schlie
(30 Oct 2005 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
John.Cowan
(30 Oct 2005 16:30 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 20:29 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 13:17 UTC)
|
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:39:55 -0700 (PDT) From: bear <xxxxxx@sonic.net> With (read) capable of executing arbitrary code via quote, etc. it is entirely possible for (read) to encounter an error. I want to know whether an error returned from (read) is one that was written and read, or one that prevented correct reading from occurring. Why does it not suffice for READ to return objects that were written and to signal, not to return, conditions for a condition handler to receive?