Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (25 Jul 2006 20:25 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Alex Shinn (26 Jul 2006 02:04 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 05:03 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Alan Watson (26 Jul 2006 08:40 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 09:02 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest bear (04 Sep 2006 17:31 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (26 Jul 2006 15:12 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 15:35 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (26 Jul 2006 16:23 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (27 Jul 2006 15:51 UTC)

Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber 27 Jul 2006 15:51 UTC

Andre van Tonder <xxxxxx@now.het.brown.edu> writes:

> For arithmetic, perhaps multiples of 8 bits are not so important.
> However, is this specification is supposed to also be usable for fast
> operations on blobs, where multiples of 8 are inherent?  If not,
> perhaps a parallel set of operations for the blob-inherent types would
> be useful as a separate library.

Probably true.  Alas, too late for R6RS.  Want to take a stab at a
SRFI? :-)

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla