Re: arithmetic issues | Simplelists

arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (21 Oct 2005 14:53 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues John.Cowan (21 Oct 2005 15:59 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues bear (21 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues John.Cowan (22 Oct 2005 02:03 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: +nan.0 problems bear (24 Oct 2005 06:04 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (23 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 Oct 2005 20:30 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (23 Oct 2005 22:25 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 Oct 2005 22:30 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (21 Oct 2005 17:15 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (21 Oct 2005 20:24 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (21 Oct 2005 20:32 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson (22 Oct 2005 00:26 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (22 Oct 2005 00:45 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (22 Oct 2005 01:17 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (22 Oct 2005 01:22 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: arithmetic issues Bradley Lucier (23 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (23 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (23 Oct 2005 19:54 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Jens Axel Søgaard (23 Oct 2005 20:01 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (23 Oct 2005 20:50 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 Oct 2005 21:12 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (23 Oct 2005 22:31 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 Oct 2005 22:33 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (23 Oct 2005 22:50 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 Oct 2005 22:57 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 00:53 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 Oct 2005 01:05 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 01:45 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 02:00 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 02:08 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 02:14 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 02:45 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson (24 Oct 2005 02:13 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 02:22 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson (24 Oct 2005 03:19 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 Oct 2005 02:01 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer (24 Oct 2005 02:27 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson (24 Oct 2005 03:14 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues John.Cowan (24 Oct 2005 05:37 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Per Bothner (24 Oct 2005 07:05 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 07:58 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 Oct 2005 08:05 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson (24 Oct 2005 08:25 UTC)

reading NaNs Aubrey Jaffer (24 Oct 2005 15:35 UTC)

Re: reading NaNs Per Bothner (24 Oct 2005 17:35 UTC)

Re: reading NaNs bear (24 Oct 2005 19:23 UTC)

Re: reading NaNs Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 Oct 2005 18:17 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues bear (24 Oct 2005 06:13 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Taylor Campbell (24 Oct 2005 06:27 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues bear (24 Oct 2005 16:41 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 Oct 2005 07:49 UTC)

Re: arithmetic issues Aubrey Jaffer 23 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC

 | From: Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu>
 | Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:45:49 -0500
 |
 | > Aubrey Jaffer <xxxxxx@alum.mit.edu> writes:
 | >
 | >> When different NaNs are returned depending on the circumstances
 | >> creating them, I would like my implementation to display them
 | >> like this:
 | >>
 | >>   #<not-a-number expt>
 |
 | If "expt" means exponent, then you don't get any more
 | information--- in IEEE arithmetic, the exponents of all NaNs of a
 | given precision are the same.

No, its expt as in EXPT, the Scheme procedure:

  (expt +inf.0 0)    ==>  #<not-a-number expt>

  (+ -inf.0 +inf.0)  ==>  #<not-a-number +>

  (/ (* 0 -inf.0) 3) ==>  #<not-a-number *>

  (+ 5 (/ 0.0 0.0))  ==>  #<not-a-number />