Re: arithmetic issues Alan Watson 24 Oct 2005 02:12 UTC

Taylor Campbell wrote:
> NaN is *not* a numeric result; it's not a number!  It represents the
> condition of a computation whose meaning is undefined; it's not a
> defined result.

Your statements about NaNs are correct in the context of mathematical
numbers but not in the context of IEEE floating point numbers.

Regards,

Alan
--
Dr Alan Watson
Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica
Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México