Re: arithmetic issues Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk 23 Oct 2005 22:50 UTC

Thomas Bushnell BSG <xxxxxx@becket.net> writes:

> Aubrey has a point here.  The tradition to which you refer has not
> historically included so-called "error objects".

There is no reason to treat them specially in this regard.

--
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       xxxxxx@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/