|
Re: Overuse of strings
Lauri Alanko
(24 Jan 2006 17:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2006 19:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Alan Bawden
(25 Jan 2006 00:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2006 01:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Per Bothner
(25 Jan 2006 02:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Alan Bawden
(25 Jan 2006 02:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Lauri Alanko
(25 Jan 2006 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Neil Van Dyke
(25 Jan 2006 19:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
bear
(25 Jan 2006 22:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Lauri Alanko
(26 Jan 2006 07:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2006 01:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Neil Van Dyke
(26 Jan 2006 02:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Anton van Straaten
(26 Jan 2006 10:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Lauri Alanko
(26 Jan 2006 10:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Alex Shinn
(26 Jan 2006 02:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Overuse of strings
Ray Blaak
(26 Jan 2006 06:56 UTC)
|
On 1/26/06, Neil Van Dyke <xxxxxx@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > > [...] I imagine that W3C- and IETF-types would have > comments wrt the authority component of the URI if the "scheme" > URI-scheme were proposed. I suspect some would question whether or not > a new URI-scheme is needed, which might beg other questions. The recommended approach would probably be to use a URN (rfc2141): urn:scheme://r6rs Of course, you'd then need to register the "scheme" namespace identifier, but this is less obtrusive than a "scheme" URI-scheme, and after all we're talking about names, not locations. -- Alex
