SRFI like cut (SRFI-26) but with ordered arguments
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 Aug 2021 07:30 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI like cut (SRFI-26) but with ordered arguments
Shiro Kawai
(14 Aug 2021 08:57 UTC)
|
Unicode lambda revisited
Lassi Kortela
(14 Aug 2021 09:45 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Lassi Kortela
(14 Aug 2021 09:52 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Aug 2021 06:17 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Peter
(15 Aug 2021 17:21 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Aug 2021 17:28 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Aug 2021 07:37 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2021 10:58 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Shiro Kawai
(16 Aug 2021 12:09 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(16 Aug 2021 12:54 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2021 13:38 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(16 Aug 2021 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(16 Aug 2021 19:11 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(16 Aug 2021 15:49 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2021 19:56 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Shiro Kawai
(16 Aug 2021 23:26 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(17 Aug 2021 03:40 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Shiro Kawai
(17 Aug 2021 04:15 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(17 Aug 2021 15:04 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Aug 2021 15:34 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(17 Aug 2021 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Aug 2021 19:22 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Shiro Kawai
(17 Aug 2021 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Aug 2021 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(18 Aug 2021 23:13 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(19 Aug 2021 16:03 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(19 Aug 2021 16:19 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(19 Aug 2021 16:49 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(16 Aug 2021 21:03 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
John Cowan
(16 Aug 2021 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Lassi Kortela
(17 Aug 2021 05:04 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Peter
(16 Aug 2021 16:58 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Arthur A. Gleckler
(16 Aug 2021 17:00 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Lassi Kortela
(16 Aug 2021 17:36 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited
Arthur A. Gleckler
(16 Aug 2021 17:56 UTC)
|
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Aug 2021 04:37 UTC)
|
In addition to the code snippet from Arthur, I can suggest the following: #+begin_src elisp (defvar lockywolf/common-mathematical-prettify-alist (list '("<=" . ?≤) '(">=" . ?≥)) "Lockywolf's custom prettification list.") (add-hook 'scheme-mode-hook (lambda () (setq prettify-symbols-alist (seq-concatenate 'list (list '("define" . ?≝) '("set!" . ?≐) '("set-car!" . ?≔) '("set-cdr!" . ?≕) '("#t" . ?✓) '("#f" . ?✗) '("'()" . ?∅) '("if" . ?⁇) '("or" . ?∨) '("and" . ?∧)) lockywolf/common-mathematical-prettify-alist prettify-symbols-alist)) )) (add-hook 'emacs-lisp-mode-hook (lambda () (setq prettify-symbols-alist (seq-concatenate 'list (list '("defun" . ?≝) '("set" . ?≔) '("setf" . ?≕) '("setq" . ?≐) '("t" . ?✓) '("nil" . ?⦰) '("'()" . ?∅) '("if" . ?⁇) '("or" . ?∨) '("and" . ?∧)) lockywolf/common-mathematical-prettify-alist prettify-symbols-alist)) )) (use-package prettify-greek :ensure t :demand t) (global-prettify-symbols-mode 1) (setq prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point t) (add-hook 'prog-mode-hook (lambda () (setq prettify-symbols-alist (seq-concatenate 'list prettify-symbols-alist prettify-greek-upper prettify-greek-lower)))) #+end_src You can check if it is readable for you by, for example: #+begin_src ;;;; check prettification (lambda (a b) (or (+ a b) (if nil t '()))) #+end_src This list is unfinished, I would generally like to have a way to: 1. Quickly distinguish primitive forms from derived. 2. Quickly distinguish procedures from syntax. But (1) would require reading a lot through the character table, and I do not have a lot of time for that at the moment; (2) is do not know how to do. "Peter" <xxxxxx@gmx.net> writes: >> Saying that, however, I do use Emacs fontification to substitute fancy >> symbols in place of lambda, define, set!, set-car, set-cdr, and some >> other built-ins. > > Would you mind sharing that mapping? That sounds interesting! -- Your sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf) (Laptop)