Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org
Amirouche 25 Apr 2021 19:27 UTC
On 2021-04-25 20:56, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:51 AM Amirouche <xxxxxx@hyper.dev>
> wrote:
>
>> I want to setup a sourcehut instance for the community.
>>
>> ref: the hacker forge https://sr.ht/
>
> I'm just
> wondering because they have notices up that describe it as "alpha
> quality."
It is alpha maybe in terms of features, the quality of
existing features is good. From time to time they are bugs.
Here are the bugs for the ML service:
- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht
Here are the bugs for the git service:
- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/git.sr.ht
Also build service:
- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/builds.sr.ht
I really like the build service. And if you are the owner,
you can add whatever docker image you want.
Also, they might not be ready for web-scale.
> That looks interesting. Have you used it in a real project?
I have some solo projects there https://sr.ht/~amirouche/
I follow several mailing lists with one that has a lot of traffic.
I have no use for the wiki, I tried the issue tracker it works.
My favorite features are the mailling list service, and the build / ci
service.
It is coded with Python and Go.
The UI/UX is much cleaner, less confusing than github or gitlab.
FWIW, from a social (!) perspective it is missing favorites
or watch this project. But there is RSS / ATOM feeds. Also, it
has an API, including OAUTH, and a mechanism to interop with
other systems called dispatch. The other major feature that is
missing and not planned is pull-request / merge request. Patches
should be sent to a mailing list with git-send. But it is possible
to create you own service and interop, if there is a need.