forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 18:51 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Arthur A. Gleckler (25 Apr 2021 18:56 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 19:27 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Marc Feeley (25 Apr 2021 19:43 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 19:59 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Marc Feeley (25 Apr 2021 20:36 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (25 Apr 2021 21:27 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (26 Apr 2021 07:36 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (26 Apr 2021 07:57 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (26 Apr 2021 07:29 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (21 May 2021 09:52 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (01 Aug 2021 07:25 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Vasilij Schneidermann (01 Aug 2021 07:56 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (02 Aug 2021 06:34 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (06 Aug 2021 10:28 UTC)

Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche 25 Apr 2021 19:27 UTC


On 2021-04-25 20:56, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:51 AM Amirouche <xxxxxx@hyper.dev>
> wrote:
>
>> I want to setup a sourcehut instance for the community.
>>
>> ref: the hacker forge https://sr.ht/
>

> I'm just
> wondering because they have notices up that describe it as "alpha
> quality."

It is alpha maybe in terms of features, the quality of
existing features is good. From time to time they are bugs.

Here are the bugs for the ML service:

- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht

Here are the bugs for the git service:

- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/git.sr.ht

Also build service:

- https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/builds.sr.ht

I really like the build service. And if you are the owner,
you can add whatever docker image you want.

Also, they might not be ready for web-scale.

> That looks interesting.  Have you used it in a real project?

I have some solo projects there https://sr.ht/~amirouche/

I follow several mailing lists with one that has a lot of traffic.

I have no use for the wiki, I tried the issue tracker it works.

My favorite features are the mailling list service, and the build / ci
service.

It is coded with Python and Go.

The UI/UX is much cleaner, less confusing than github or gitlab.

FWIW, from a social (!) perspective it is missing favorites
or watch this project. But there is RSS / ATOM feeds. Also, it
has an API, including OAUTH, and a mechanism to interop with
other systems called dispatch. The other major feature that is
missing and not planned is pull-request / merge request. Patches
should be sent to a mailing list with git-send. But it is possible
to create you own service and interop, if there is a need.