Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 18:51 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Arthur A. Gleckler (25 Apr 2021 18:56 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 19:27 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Marc Feeley (25 Apr 2021 19:43 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (25 Apr 2021 19:59 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Marc Feeley (25 Apr 2021 20:36 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (25 Apr 2021 21:27 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (26 Apr 2021 07:36 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (26 Apr 2021 07:57 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (26 Apr 2021 07:29 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (21 May 2021 09:52 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (01 Aug 2021 07:25 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Vasilij Schneidermann (01 Aug 2021 07:56 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche (02 Aug 2021 06:34 UTC)
Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela (06 Aug 2021 10:28 UTC)

Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Lassi Kortela 06 Aug 2021 10:28 UTC

On 02.08.2021 9.33, Amirouche wrote:
> I believe moving to Go will lead to another cycle of fine-tuning /
> bug-fixing. That is, it will remain unstable.

Thanks for reporting on the latest news from SourceHut, Amirouche!

Like Vasilij, I would find a single Go executable to be nicer to manage
than Docker, assuming it works, but your point stands about rewriting
working code in another language.

I would also consider setting up GitLab at some point, since many
schemers seem to be familiar with it and already using GitLab.com.
https://salsa.debian.org/scheme-team and
https://cm-gitlab.stanford.edu/bil/s7 are also GitLab. The server-side
software seems pretty bloated (Ruby, SQL database, 4GiB RAM), but there
are not that many well established alternatives.

In the interest of keeping scheme.org neutral, we should name these
sourcehut.scheme.org and gitlab.scheme.org, allowing the alternatives to
coexist if desired.

To me, it seems reasonable to support any platforms that:

- someone is willing to maintain
- someone provides a server for
- aren't an unusual security or reputation risk for scheme.org