Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche 26 Apr 2021 07:36 UTC
On 2021-04-25 23:27, Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Will there be a mechanism to control account creation and what will be >> required to be “approved”? > > It's probably a good idea to require a known schemer to make accounts > for new people. There could be a thread on the schemeorg mailing list > where people who want an account could write a brief mail to introduce > themselves (perhaps giving a link to Scheme code they have written > elsewhere so that people know they care about Scheme, or if they know > an existing schemer from some project, that could be stated). That would be too much to ask. I prefer to be welcoming, and assume most user come in good faith and do not plan to abuse the system. Keep an eye on usage and watch for abusers and / or enable payment. All features require to login. I will investigate moderation tools. > > A similar problem exists with so-called pastebin sites, which are > widely known to be abuse magnets unless they require a login. We > decided against making paste.scheme.org for that reason. A git hosting > site is not as prone to abuse, but the potential is still there. > Perhaps we could even make a pastebin subdomain if it requires > accounts made by similar criteria. > > Do SourceHut and/or GitLab have a pastebin-like feature? GitHub has > gist.github.com which is a good implementation of the concept. Here is an example paste: https://paste.sr.ht/~amirouche/335d70abba3ac90b12f7dc6d7365e7509457976d -- Amirouche ~ https://hyper.dev