Re: forge.scheme.org or sourcehut.scheme.org Amirouche 25 Apr 2021 19:27 UTC
On 2021-04-25 20:56, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:51 AM Amirouche <email@example.com> > wrote: > >> I want to setup a sourcehut instance for the community. >> >> ref: the hacker forge https://sr.ht/ > > I'm just > wondering because they have notices up that describe it as "alpha > quality." It is alpha maybe in terms of features, the quality of existing features is good. From time to time they are bugs. Here are the bugs for the ML service: - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht Here are the bugs for the git service: - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/git.sr.ht Also build service: - https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/builds.sr.ht I really like the build service. And if you are the owner, you can add whatever docker image you want. Also, they might not be ready for web-scale. > That looks interesting. Have you used it in a real project? I have some solo projects there https://sr.ht/~amirouche/ I follow several mailing lists with one that has a lot of traffic. I have no use for the wiki, I tried the issue tracker it works. My favorite features are the mailling list service, and the build / ci service. It is coded with Python and Go. The UI/UX is much cleaner, less confusing than github or gitlab. FWIW, from a social (!) perspective it is missing favorites or watch this project. But there is RSS / ATOM feeds. Also, it has an API, including OAUTH, and a mechanism to interop with other systems called dispatch. The other major feature that is missing and not planned is pull-request / merge request. Patches should be sent to a mailing list with git-send. But it is possible to create you own service and interop, if there is a need.