Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 18:02 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (27 Nov 2021 21:38 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 23:37 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Nov 2021 00:33 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (28 Nov 2021 00:47 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Nov 2021 14:16 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 18:03 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 18:46 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Lassi Kortela (30 Nov 2021 19:06 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 19:42 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:12 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:20 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (01 Dec 2021 00:10 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Dec 2021 00:19 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Oct 2022 01:07 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt 27 Nov 2021 23:37 UTC

Hi Arthur, thanks for the fast answer.

I created a PR, please take a look:
https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-1/pull/2

It only changes the implementation, and not the html file, since I'm not
sure the html can be changed due to its final status. The text is
actually correct, since lset-adjoin! is mentioned under "Linear
Updates". But it could also be mentioned under "Set operations on lists"
like the others. Not a big deal though.

Best regards,

Ricardo

Am 27.11.2021 22:38 schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Ricardo G. Herdt <xxxxxx@posteo.de>
> wrote:
>
>> I noticed lset-adjoin! is not implemented in SRFI-1's reference
>> implementation, although it is mentioned in the specification under
>>
>> "Linear update procedures". It is not mentioned under "Set
>> operations on
>> lists" though. Was it removed/left out on purpose?
>
> Wow, good catch.  I'm sure it was an accident.  What amazes me is that
> it wasn't caught until now.
>
> If you or anyone else would like to provide an implementation, either
> as a patch or as a pull request, I would be happy to add it.
>
> Thanks.