Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 18:02 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (27 Nov 2021 21:38 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 23:37 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Nov 2021 00:33 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (28 Nov 2021 00:47 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Nov 2021 14:16 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 18:03 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 18:46 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Lassi Kortela (30 Nov 2021 19:06 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 19:42 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:12 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:20 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (01 Dec 2021 00:10 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Dec 2021 00:19 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Oct 2022 01:07 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Lassi Kortela 30 Nov 2021 19:06 UTC

> In fact, as I wrote above, lset-adjoin! doesn't make that much sense
> because the list argument cannot be mutated anyway because of how
> lset-adjoin! is spec'ed.

Does any implementation of SRFI 1 actually carry `lset-adjoin!`? I can't
find a single Scheme implementation that ships it, not even Guile or
scsh. If there are none, could we add a post-finalization note that says
the procedure is omitted?