Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index

Show/hide message thread

lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 18:02 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (27 Nov 2021 21:38 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 23:37 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Nov 2021 00:33 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (28 Nov 2021 00:47 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Nov 2021 14:16 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 18:03 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 18:46 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Lassi Kortela (30 Nov 2021 19:06 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 19:42 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:12 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:20 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (01 Dec 2021 00:10 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Dec 2021 00:19 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Oct 2022 01:07 UTC)

Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt 28 Nov 2021 00:47 UTC

Hi,

Am 28.11.2021 01:32 schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:
>> Thank you. This looks correct given that the text describing
>> linear-update procedures doesn't specify which arguments one may
>> update. Still, I would be surprised by this implementation, which
>> may modify elts, not just lis. What do you think?
>

I kind of took inspiration from lset-union!. Changing lis would be
tricky, since it can be empty, and set-cdr! doesn't work on empty lists.
Maybe others can give some better insights on this.

Ricardo