proposing a simpler mechanism
R. Kent Dybvig
(13 Nov 2009 03:00 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 04:23 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Taylor R Campbell
(13 Nov 2009 04:31 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
R. Kent Dybvig
(13 Nov 2009 16:22 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Per Bothner
(13 Nov 2009 16:56 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 04:54 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Alex Queiroz
(13 Nov 2009 13:44 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Marc Feeley
(13 Nov 2009 14:24 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 18:39 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 18:36 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Alex Queiroz
(13 Nov 2009 19:08 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 19:21 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
David Van Horn
(13 Nov 2009 19:25 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Nov 2009 19:36 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
David Van Horn
(13 Nov 2009 19:58 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Nov 2009 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: proposing a simpler mechanism
David Van Horn
(12 Jan 2010 18:51 UTC)
|
> Case-lambda is not a part of standard scheme. If you mean srfi-16, > notice the way the reference implementation works. It defines a > procedure with a formals list that looks like this: Case-lambda is part of R6RS.