Re: u8-ready? and char-ready?

Show/hide message thread

SRFI 181: Custom ports Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Feb 2020 08:03 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Lassi Kortela (16 Feb 2020 14:01 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Lassi Kortela (21 Feb 2020 23:24 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports John Cowan (22 Feb 2020 19:19 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Vincent Manis (17 Feb 2020 23:04 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports John Cowan (18 Feb 2020 17:51 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Arthur A. Gleckler (18 Feb 2020 18:22 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports John Cowan (19 Feb 2020 12:42 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Feb 2020 18:11 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Lassi Kortela (19 Feb 2020 18:13 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Feb 2020 18:17 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Lassi Kortela (19 Feb 2020 18:30 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Feb 2020 18:51 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Vincent Manis (19 Feb 2020 22:57 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Jim Rees (04 Mar 2020 12:36 UTC)

u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 12:46 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Jim Rees (04 Mar 2020 13:09 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 13:30 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Jim Rees (04 Mar 2020 14:48 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 15:07 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 15:13 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 15:31 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (04 Mar 2020 15:39 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 15:49 UTC)

SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 16:08 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 16:13 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 16:18 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 16:26 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 16:28 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 16:46 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 17:03 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes John Cowan (04 Mar 2020 23:23 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Marc Feeley (05 Mar 2020 13:08 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes John Cowan (05 Mar 2020 20:44 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Göran Weinholt (05 Mar 2020 22:16 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes John Cowan (05 Mar 2020 22:22 UTC)

Re: SRFI 18 implementation status - R5RS/R7RS Schemes Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Mar 2020 19:26 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 15:07 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 15:31 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Jim Rees (04 Mar 2020 15:32 UTC)

Waiting on custom ports / CL Gray Streams Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 15:41 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? John Cowan (04 Mar 2020 17:18 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Lassi Kortela (04 Mar 2020 17:26 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley (04 Mar 2020 14:55 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Jim Rees (04 Mar 2020 19:31 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports John Cowan (05 Mar 2020 00:36 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports Jim Rees (05 Mar 2020 21:53 UTC)

Re: SRFI 181: Custom ports John Cowan (05 Mar 2020 22:08 UTC)

Re: u8-ready? and char-ready? Marc Feeley 04 Mar 2020 14:55 UTC

> On Mar 4, 2020, at 8:29 AM, Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:
>
> More generally, I'm not convinced that it's the best idea to have standard procedures to test for a single port. It's often useful to wait for multiple things at once, and waiting for only one thing can be done as a special case of that.

Indeed… all forms of waiting for availability of I/O including timeouts must be integrated in the thread system.  This usually means funnelling all of this through select/poll on Unix (MsgWaitForMultipleObjects on Windows).  As soon as you make an exception, you need to use polling which is not scalable in general.

Marc