Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 28 Aug 2020 18:13 UTC
On 2020-08-28 18:27 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> Note that in my proposal, the start-index is not exposed to the indexer.
> The various SRFI 196 procedures add the start index to n before passing it
> to the indexer.
Do we think it's worthwhile to export the range-start-index accessor?
I can't see much use for it.
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
"Personally, I get a little tired of the argument: My worse-is-better
is better than your worse-is-better because I'm better at being
worser!" --Larry Wall
