Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers?
Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 29 Aug 2020 17:43 UTC
Am Sa., 29. Aug. 2020 um 19:29 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
<xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>:
> Yes. An obvious extension is to accept #f as the <end> argument of
> numeric-range (or to make <end> optional and reverse the argument
> order), but this would require revision of range-length, range-end,
> and the other procedures which expect ranges to have finite length.
Speaking of "range-end", please consider renaming it to "range-last".
One reason for this is that the "range-end" of a numeric range is not
the end of that range (as per the "numeric-range" constructor).
