Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(15 Sep 2020 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(15 Sep 2020 19:13 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Sep 2020 01:54 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(16 Sep 2020 02:49 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(16 Sep 2020 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Sep 2020 06:19 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (16 Sep 2020 16:11 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(16 Sep 2020 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 04:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(17 Sep 2020 05:49 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 06:04 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 07:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:08 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 07:14 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:22 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 07:25 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 07:50 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Sep 2020 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(17 Sep 2020 08:04 UTC)
|
Re: Any more bugs/typos?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(17 Sep 2020 16:47 UTC)
|
On 2020-09-16 14:19 +0800, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > >Is the intention to make draw-bezier variadic > > It is variadic, yes. You can supply 3 or more points. If this is so, then I think the specification of draw-bezier could be more clearly written as (draw-bezier vec1 vec2 [vec3 [vec4]]) with the following description: "Draws a cubic Bezier curve between *vec1* and *vec2*. If the *vec3* argument is supplied, then a quadric curve is drawn. If *vec4* is supplied, then *vec2* and *vec3* are used as knots. It is an error if any argument is not a list of at least two numbers. If the canvas does not exist, it is created." I find this more compact and clearer than the current description, which must refer to list elements rather than named arguments. I also noticed that the sentence "In the simplest case this procedure can be a synonym to jpeg-file->painter" seems to be misplaced. It appears in the description of jpeg-file->painter, but clearly refers to image-file->painter. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> "Not all programming languages have a way to write definitions, but most do. Those that do not are for wimps." --The Great Quux