Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (15 Sep 2020 15:35 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (15 Sep 2020 19:13 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (16 Sep 2020 01:54 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Sep 2020 02:49 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (16 Sep 2020 05:50 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (16 Sep 2020 06:19 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (16 Sep 2020 16:11 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (16 Sep 2020 16:15 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 04:00 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (17 Sep 2020 05:49 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 06:04 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2020 07:00 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 07:08 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2020 07:14 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 07:22 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2020 07:25 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 07:50 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2020 08:00 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Sep 2020 08:04 UTC)
Re: Any more bugs/typos? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (17 Sep 2020 16:47 UTC)

Re: Any more bugs/typos? Vladimir Nikishkin 17 Sep 2020 07:49 UTC

Okay, I see your point.
Please, have a look for other things that are worth paying attention to.

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 15:25, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
>
> Am Do., 17. Sept. 2020 um 09:22 Uhr schrieb Vladimir Nikishkin
> <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
> >
> > This is an optional procedure anyway.
> > The specification does not prohibit the implementation from
> > implementing proper Bezier curves.
> >
> > "It is not an error to supply more than one <code>vecI</code>, but this
> > SRFI does not specify an exact behaviour." is what the latest draft says.
>
> That does not make sense to me, given the idea of this SRFI.

--
Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin