New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Arthur A. Gleckler (05 Oct 2020 15:56 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (05 Oct 2020 17:29 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Daphne Preston-Kendal (05 Oct 2020 18:05 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (05 Oct 2020 19:18 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (05 Oct 2020 20:19 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Oct 2020 05:44 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Oct 2020 16:14 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Oct 2020 17:16 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Daphne Preston-Kendal (07 Oct 2020 09:07 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Oct 2020 09:24 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Daphne Preston-Kendal (07 Oct 2020 09:49 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Oct 2020 15:08 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Oct 2020 15:22 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Oct 2020 15:57 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Oct 2020 16:06 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Oct 2020 16:22 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Oct 2020 18:14 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Daphne Preston-Kendal (07 Oct 2020 10:01 UTC)

Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 07 Oct 2020 15:57 UTC

On 2020-10-07 17:22 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> If a split is done, the write and read procedures probably should go
> into the lexical syntax SRFI.

The read/write-textual-bytestring procedures should be part of the
lexical syntax SRFI, but I think write-binary-bytestring belongs
in the bytestrings document--its semantics derive from `bytestring',
after all.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"As Will Rogers would have said, 'There is no such thing as a
free variable.'" --Alan J. Perlis