Am Mi., 7. Okt. 2020 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
<xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>:
>
> On 2020-10-07 17:22 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> > If a split is done, the write and read procedures probably should go
> > into the lexical syntax SRFI.
>
> The read/write-textual-bytestring procedures should be part of the
> lexical syntax SRFI, but I think write-binary-bytestring belongs
> in the bytestrings document--its semantics derive from `bytestring',
> after all.

Yes, of course. I didn't think of this procedure.

Speaking of this procedure: Isn't a similar procedure that returns a
generator (instead of directly writing the bytes to a port) more
general and useful?