bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Shiro Kawai
(07 Oct 2020 10:01 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(07 Oct 2020 15:15 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Oct 2020 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(07 Oct 2020 16:47 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(07 Oct 2020 18:21 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Shiro Kawai
(07 Oct 2020 21:06 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Lassi Kortela
(08 Oct 2020 13:07 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Shiro Kawai
(08 Oct 2020 13:13 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(08 Oct 2020 13:24 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(10 Oct 2020 07:42 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Shiro Kawai
(10 Oct 2020 09:38 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(10 Oct 2020 15:04 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(10 Oct 2020 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(10 Oct 2020 23:08 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(11 Oct 2020 03:20 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Oct 2020 08:26 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(11 Oct 2020 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(11 Oct 2020 08:42 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Oct 2020 09:10 UTC)
|
Optional features in SRFIs again, this time with syntax
Lassi Kortela
(11 Oct 2020 11:38 UTC)
|
Re: Optional features in SRFIs again, this time with syntax
John Cowan
(11 Oct 2020 13:01 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(11 Oct 2020 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Oct 2020 18:31 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Oct 2020 17:20 UTC)
|
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right?
John Cowan
(14 Oct 2020 15:20 UTC)
|
Comparing two vectors Lassi Kortela (08 Oct 2020 13:13 UTC)
|
Re: Comparing two vectors
John Cowan
(08 Oct 2020 15:01 UTC)
|
Re: Comparing two vectors
Lassi Kortela
(08 Oct 2020 20:42 UTC)
|
On 07.10.2020 18.15, John Cowan wrote: > But the other comparisons <, >, etc. do not make sense for arbitrary > bytevectors any more than they do for vectors I don't understand this claim. It seems to me that vector<? and bytevector<? would both use < to compare adjacent elements, and a shorter vector is considered "less than" when it's a prefix of a longer one.