On 2020-10-10 16:40 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> I am still opposed to splitting.  I think it unlikely that implementations
> will provide the lexical syntax without the library, and doing things the
> other way round is routine.  I forget who I said what to, but for
> R7RS-large purposes, new lexical syntax will be voted on at the end of the
> process; for example, SRFI 160 is part of the Tangerine Edition, but the
> associated #f32(...) etc. notation is not.

Fine by me, although I'm slightly confused by these points: they seem
to *support* splitting the SRFI.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"I have discovered a truly marvelous implementation of this
function which this 80-column limit is too narrow to contain."
--fishythefish