On 07.10.2020 18.15, John Cowan wrote:
> But the other comparisons <, >, etc. do not make sense for arbitrary
> bytevectors any more than they do for vectors

I don't understand this claim. It seems to me that vector<? and
bytevector<? would both use < to compare adjacent elements, and a
shorter vector is considered "less than" when it's a prefix of a longer one.