bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Shiro Kawai (07 Oct 2020 10:01 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (07 Oct 2020 15:15 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Oct 2020 16:15 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Oct 2020 16:47 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Oct 2020 18:21 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Shiro Kawai (07 Oct 2020 21:06 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Lassi Kortela (08 Oct 2020 13:07 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Shiro Kawai (08 Oct 2020 13:13 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (08 Oct 2020 13:24 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (10 Oct 2020 07:42 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Shiro Kawai (10 Oct 2020 09:38 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (10 Oct 2020 15:04 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (10 Oct 2020 20:40 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (10 Oct 2020 23:08 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (11 Oct 2020 03:20 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Oct 2020 08:26 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Daphne Preston-Kendal (11 Oct 2020 08:39 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (11 Oct 2020 08:42 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Oct 2020 09:10 UTC)
Optional features in SRFIs again, this time with syntax Lassi Kortela (11 Oct 2020 11:38 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Oct 2020 18:22 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Oct 2020 18:31 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Oct 2020 17:20 UTC)
Re: bytestring isn't a datatype, right? John Cowan (14 Oct 2020 15:20 UTC)
Comparing two vectors Lassi Kortela (08 Oct 2020 13:13 UTC)
Re: Comparing two vectors John Cowan (08 Oct 2020 15:01 UTC)
Re: Comparing two vectors Lassi Kortela (08 Oct 2020 20:42 UTC)

Comparing two vectors Lassi Kortela 08 Oct 2020 13:13 UTC

On 07.10.2020 18.15, John Cowan wrote:
> But the other comparisons <, >, etc. do not make sense for arbitrary
> bytevectors any more than they do for vectors

I don't understand this claim. It seems to me that vector<? and
bytevector<? would both use < to compare adjacent elements, and a
shorter vector is considered "less than" when it's a prefix of a longer one.